top of page

✴️ We Were Told This Was Liberation. But It Feels Like Loneliness.

  • Writer: Chelsea Joy Arganbright
    Chelsea Joy Arganbright
  • Jul 23
  • 4 min read

There is a quiet, persistent ache I keep seeing in people. An ache that doesn’t always have language, but shows up in the eyes, in the body, in the space between texts that never get answered, or dates that never quite lead anywhere, or relationships that hover in some strange limbo between closeness and collapse. I used to think it was just me. That I was being too sensitive, too idealistic, too attached to old ideas of intimacy, commitment, or love. But now I realise I’ve simply been feeling what the culture is not yet ready to name: that we are living through a profound relational disintegration. And that most of us are adapting to a state of ongoing disconnection while calling it “freedom.”


We are more technologically connected than any generation before us, and yet we are - by every measurable and intuitive metric - more emotionally severed. More touch-starved. More disoriented. More hesitant to hope, to attach, to say, “I want to build something real.” And while many have tried to explain this as a symptom of modern dating, or swipe culture, or post-pandemic anxiety, I believe the roots run far deeper. What we are experiencing is not just a social shift. It’s an era-defining one.


We are now living in the early stages of the Age of Aquarius - a planetary cycle marked by decentralisation, innovation, digital systems, social disruption, fluid identities, and technological progress. But alongside its promises of liberation and equity, the Age of Aquarius is also challenging us to confront the relational voids it has opened.


And that is the very subject I’ve devoted my psychology dissertation to.



🜁 The Crisis Beneath the Screen


My MSc dissertation examines how technocapitalism and postmodern digital culture have reshaped the architecture of intimacy - specifically, how dating apps, hyperchoice, algorithmic filtering, and the loss of embodied presence have affected our capacity to form and sustain meaningful romantic connections.


Through a qualitative, thematic analysis of interviews with people across different age groups and relational orientations, I’ve been tracking the emergence of common experiences:


  • A sense of disposability and being “filtered out” based on minor variables

  • Emotional avoidance disguised as independence

  • Increasing levels of anxious-preoccupied or avoidant attachment, even in formerly secure individuals

  • A shift from vulnerability and emotional truth to performance and “curated selfhood”

  • Decision fatigue, distrust, and the absence of clear relational scripts


Many of the people I spoke with are not bitter or cynical. They are reflective, self-aware, and genuinely searching for something real. But what emerged was not just frustration - it was fatigue. A kind of spiritual burnout from investing in spaces that no longer seem to hold the blueprint for intimacy, or the safety for emotional exposure.


It’s not that people don’t want love anymore. It’s that they don’t believe love, as they once knew it, is possible in the systems we’ve created.


🜂 Aquarius Without Leo: Freedom Without Heart


Astrologically, Aquarius is the sign of liberation, systems, detachment, and the collective. It governs networks, futurism, decentralisation, and innovation. But every sign exists in polarity. And the opposite of Aquarius is Leo - the heart, the personal, the creative fire of love that is felt, not theorised.


What we are seeing is Aquarius unchecked by Leo. Technology without tenderness. Networks without nuance. Connection without devotion. We’re becoming relationally sophisticated, but emotionally malnourished. We are “connected” to hundreds, but unable to be held by one.


And beneath the cultural language of empowerment and fluidity, I see what’s really happening:


• We are terrified to need anyone.

• We are terrified to not be chosen.

• So we pre-empt abandonment by never attaching too deeply in the first place.

• We call it sovereignty. But much of it is just trauma dressed as freedom.


🜃 What I Do, and Why I Was Born for This


I don’t just study these patterns. I live inside them. And I have made it my life’s work to help others navigate them - both psychologically and spiritually.


As a brand strategist, retreat facilitator, astrologer, and now trainee psychotherapist, everything I do orbits around a singular intention: to help people return to their own centre, to re-embody emotional truth, and to create lives and relationships that are not performative, but real.


That includes:


  • Designing slow, grounded spaces for women to reconnect with their bodies and nervous systems through trauma-informed programs

  • Facilitating inner child and parts-based healing using IFS and somatic methods

  • Offering astrocartography and birth chart readings that anchor people back into their place in the world

  • Writing about intimacy, dissociation, and the spiritual consequences of disconnection

  • Creating retreats that feel like a return to the sacred - in love, in the body, and in the rhythms of life


⭐️I do not offer instant transformation. I hold space for slow integration.

⭐️I do not promise high-vibe healing. I teach people how to be with their truth, even when it’s messy.

⭐️And I do not believe that freedom must come at the expense of safety, or love at the expense of autonomy.


This is what I’ve come to teach in the Age of Aquarius. That liberation without love is not liberation at all. That connection must be reclaimed - not in theory, but in embodied, intentional ways.


🜄 What We’re Being Asked to Learn


If this age is teaching us anything, it’s that intimacy must become a conscious act. No longer socially inherited, no longer biologically inevitable, but cultivated with care, presence, and discernment.


We must learn how to:


  • Hold emotional ambiguity without bypassing it

  • Commit without losing ourselves

  • Communicate with honesty, even when it’s uncomfortable

  • Stay, even when our trauma tells us to run

  • Be chosen, and still choose ourselves


Because while Aquarius may be here to decentralise and disrupt, Leo remains the antidote - a return to the personal, to the body, to the wild and messy nature of love that cannot be coded, curated, or replaced by an algorithm.


🜅 Closing Words


The Age of Aquarius is not the end of intimacy, but it will force us to grieve the loss of what once was. And in that space of grief, there is also possibility. We can rebuild. But only if we stop pretending this is progress. Only if we tell the truth about what we’re feeling. And only if we begin the long, gentle work of coming back to truth. first to ourselves, then to each other.


This is the work I’ve chosen to do.

And if you feel the ache too, then you already know…We were made to progress but meanwhile, find love amidst the chaos.

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page